Why am I even preparing to defend my POV?Ī while back I posted the 360 heads of the sphere girding the earth.(nobody cared(laugh)) I think it is relevant to what Cayce had to say. IMO astologers should not take a big poop on magic and call it unrelated.thats narowminded to the extreme, and probably just plain stupid.(laugh) The true magician, however, will find a much closer relation between the individual spheres, if he deals with astrology, and will notice that astrology shows the true influences The astrological part of the higher spheres will not be dealt with here, for it does not come within the scope of this book. …astrologers have discovered a somehow workable synthesis, but unfortunately the astrologers of today uses this chiefly only for mantic purposes, and it is hardly known that astrology actually only gives a partial explanation of the influences of these spheres, of planets and zodiacal signs. Did Cayce study magic, I doubt it myself, but I don't know enough of Cayce.I thought he was a good Christian Boy who thought astrology was quite naughty till he couldn't disprove it and came across it in his readings.then and only then did he give it an eye, or so I read once.I love a skeptic, I really do.įrom "In the Domain of the Spirit Beings"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |